logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.09.06 2018가단131749
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that carries on the manufacturing and selling business of automobile parts, and Nonparty D (hereinafter “Non-Party D”) is a legal entity that carries on the wholesale and retail business of household goods, and the Defendant is the representative director of the non-party company.

B. The Plaintiff, upon the Defendant’s request, supplied the non-party company with automobile interior goods, etc. from May 31, 2016 to November 30, 2016, and acquired KRW 95,869,558 (the instant goods payment claim).

However, the non-party company does not pay KRW 75,000,000 among the above goods obligations.

C. The Defendant’s relationship between the Defendant and the non-party company is not only at the time of the occurrence of the instant goods payment obligation but also at the time of its long-term employment as the representative director of the non-party company. The Defendant led the decision-making and enforcement of the non-party company, and the Defendant also takes charge of all transactions, so the non-party company is in the form of a legal entity in appearance,

Although a company responsible for the defendant under the legal principles of abuse of legal personality or the principle of good faith has the external form of a legal entity, in substance, if it is merely a private enterprise behind the legal entity or the form of the legal entity is used as a means to avoid the application of the law to the person behind the legal entity, it is reasonable to assume the responsibility of the legal entity as a separate person from the legal entity.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the price of the instant goods and damages for delay to the Plaintiff.

2. Although a company has the external form of a legal entity, it is practically merely a private enterprise behind it, or it is without permission as a means to avoid the application of the law to an individual who is the person behind it.

arrow