logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고정2102
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. [2014 high-level 2102] Notwithstanding the absence or intent of the Defendant to pay the drinking value, etc., the Defendant obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount by placing an order for alcoholic beverages, etc. equivalent to KRW 980,00,00 in the total amount of KRW 360,00,00 for each of the two weeks, as if the Defendant would pay the drinking value in one room of CZ entertainment tavern in the operation of CZY located in North-gu Busan, Busan, on December 03, 2013, by deceiving the victim, as if he would pay the drinking value in one room of CZY in the operation of CY located in North-gu, Busan.

2. [2014cc. 3076] On June 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:25, at the 7 main points of “DB” of the DA 6th floor in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, the DC was raising a urier, microphone, glass cup, etc. on the table; and (b) the Defendant, as his hand, singing the singble, singer, etc. on the floor, caused the singble to fall down on the floor.

As above, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the market price equivalent to 50,000 won, such as the instant World Cup owned by the victim DD, misunderstanding, and contact.

3. [2014 high-level 3122] Around 14:00 on April 19, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim DF, who had lived together with a person in the same way as he/she was at the time, at DE 201, at DE 201, that he/she would give him/her a monthly salary after the month he/she borrowed money from his/her mother.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the victim in the course of job-seeking with no intention to do so.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one million won in cash from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of a police suspect against DC;

1. Each police statement concerning CY, D, D, D, and DF;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of receipts, photographs showing the scene of damage, and withdrawal of bankbooks;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.

arrow