A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2020. 1. 12. 08:05경 피고인의 주거지인 창원시 마산합포구 B 건물 앞에서 여자친구를 폭행하였다는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 마산중부경찰서 C파출소 소속 경위 D, 경위 E이 여자친구가 있는 위 건물 F호로 들어가려고 한다는 이유로 화가 나 경위 D의 우측 어깨를 밀친 후 손으로 경위 E의 왼쪽 팔을 잡아 벽에 밀친 다음 E의 경찰 조끼에 부착되어 있는 무전기를 잡아 흔들고, 계속하여 피고인의 여자친구를 만나서 사건 경위를 파악하려는 경위 D의 허벅지와 무릎을 발로 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen by processing a 112-reported case report slip and by cutting video images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of advisory sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the sentencing guidelines for sentencing). Although a person was already sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, the act of causing the instant crime again, the degree of force exercised, the act of causing the failure after the arrest, and other sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, criminal background, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., shall be determined as indicated in the order.