1. The Defendant’s KRW 355,072,00 for the Plaintiff and the following: 8% per annum from February 8, 2014 to October 19, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 원고는 2013. 10. 4. 피고로부터 ‘인천 송도 첼시축구학교 인조잔디 조성공사’를 공사대금 695,520,000원(부가세 별도, 선금 5,000만 원, 2013. 10. 말 중도금 2억 5,000만 원, 2014. 2. 7. 잔금 각 지급), 연체이자 연 8%로 각 정하여 하도급받아 2013. 11. 30. 위 공사를 완료하였다.

B. The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff only the advance, intermediate and remainder of the construction cost, and did not pay 355,072,000 won for the remainder of the construction cost.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 2 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above findings of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the interest rate of KRW 355,072,00 for the unpaid construction cost and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 8% per annum, which is the interest rate per annum, from February 8, 2014 to October 19, 2015, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint in this case, from February 8, 2014, and from the following day to the date of full payment, 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

이에 대하여 피고는, 위 공사대금을 지급할 자력이 없어 인천 송도 첼시축구학교 공사의 발주처인 주식회사 엔에스씨가 피고의 원고에 대한 위 공사대금채무를 인수하기로 하였으므로, 원고의 청구에 응할 수 없다는 취지로 주장하나, 원고가 이에 동의하였음을 인정할 만한 자료가 없으므로, 피고의 위 주장은 더 나아가 살필 필요 없이 이유 없다.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.