The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court found the Defendant’s vehicle not guilty of the facts charged of the instant case on the ground that it can be recognized that the Defendant’s vehicle was against the victim, but it cannot be recognized that the Defendant’s vehicle was transferred to the land by receiving the victim.

① However, it is indicated that the damage to the right edge of the victim to the remote area is likely to cause damage to the shock by the driver of a vehicle corresponding to the vehicle and large vehicle. ② On-site photo, the victim’s head flows about about 60cc away from the floor; ③ the rear wheels of the Defendant’s vehicle was found, the dust was found in the lower part of the Defendant’s vehicle; ④ the front side of the victim’s vehicle was found as a string of the string; ④ the front side of the vehicle was found as a string of the vehicle; ⑤ the front side of the vehicle was used by the victim; ⑤ the vehicle in which the accident occurred after the time of the accident is front of the Defendant’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle, and the front front side of the vehicle was found as a 14 meters away from the point of the accident, and the front side of the vehicle was found as a string of the victim’s 14 meters away from the front side of the vehicle and the front side of the CCTV.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is due to the misunderstanding of facts and the misunderstanding of legal principles against the rules of evidence.