Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a free car.

On May 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on May 10, 2013, and led to driving the car in front of the entrance of the city of Changwon-si at the Changwon-si to the Do-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

At the time, since the road is getting off and down down, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed by living well the steering gear and the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is, while driving in a broom, and driving in an opposite lane due to the negligence of driving the central line, received the front part of the victim C(41 years old) driving car as the front part of the above off-line passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as cageage cage cages, etc., which require approximately five weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer in C (Simplified traffic);

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant, on the part of his/her occupational negligence, suffers from an unexpected injury on the part of the victim; (b) the Defendant did not agree with, or receive a letter from, the victim; (c) the Defendant is disadvantageous to him/her; (d) the fact that his/her mistake is recognized; (c) the vehicle has been covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy; and (d) the Defendant separately deposited 2.5 million won for the victim.