logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.14 2016노2511
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (limited to six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, confiscation, and 40 hours of order to attend a course) declared by the court below is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment, the case of the crime of this case, and the defendant did not seem to have taken several times prior to the crime of this case, and the defendant appears to have taken several times, but on the other hand, the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant did not commit other crimes against the victim, such as indecent act by compulsion, etc., and the photograph of this case appears to have not been leaked or distributed externally, the defendant did not have any record of criminal punishment, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, etc., are not deemed to have been too unjustifiable, and thus, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow