The defendant shall be innocent.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (hereinafter “case subject to perjury”) against the said court No. 3441 C (hereinafter “instant case”) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 120, the Suwon District Court No. 210, supra. 2016.

Defendant considered that the Defendant would use the money for any purpose when the witness remitted KRW 4.7 million.

“I think to this point of view,” the attorney’s question “I ambling or I ambling.”

testimony and continued to “at any time to use 4.7 million won” and “at any time to talk with the Defendant who used 4.7 million won.”

“At the D cafeteria, I am to drink and I am to the E, and I am to cash the questions of the counsel “.”

H. He had made

“The testimony was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant has given C a remittance of KRW 4.7 million under the pretext of the purchase price of phiphones, and C was well aware of the fact in E and tightly in order to purchase phiphones.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Maz.

1. According to each evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the following facts are recognized.

A. On July 20, 2015, C was convicted of the facts charged that he purchased approximately KRW 20 g 4.5 million from the needy in front of the F Station on July 20, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive.

B. On July 20, 2015, the Defendant remitted KRW 4.7 million to the deposit account in the name of 10:36 C on the same day, and C withdrawn KRW 4.63 million in cash from the cash payment machine at around 12:45, and delivered KRW 4.5 million among them, and E purchased phiphones from the front side of the F Station and delivered them to E.

(c)

On July 20, 2015, the Defendant exchanged eight times with C from 09:0 to 19:00, and among them, C is about three times and one day.