1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph 2 below. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 11th written “each description” in the second place shall be written with “each description or image division”.

B. From 16th to 18th of the second place, “B Defendant has been occupying, using, and making profits from, the road after executing water supply facilities and asphalt contact packing installation works on each of the instant lands since 2010 on each of the instant lands.” ② Each of the instant lands was in cement packaging as part of the Saemaul Movement Project in the 1970s, and thereafter is being used as a road by public passage. There was no data to confirm that the Plaintiff voluntarily provided each of the instant lands to the State or local governments at the time of the said Saemaul Movement Project, and the Defendant had obtained the consent of the Plaintiff on each of the instant lands to lay underground water supply facilities, including water pipes, from the Plaintiff around 201.

③ At present, the Defendant manages the upstreams, etc. laid underground as above, and maintains and manages each of the instant land as a road by installing a white straw line, which is a mark dividing lanes on cement packing of each of the instant land, and a mark prohibiting entry into the left or right-hand turn, which is a mark prohibiting entry into the road.

The term "ros. . 5 to 12 parallels in the third place are as follows. The defendant agreed or consented to incorporate each of the land of this case into a road site at the time of the implementation of the Saemaul Movement Project, and agreed to the construction of a waterway through which each of the land of this case was passed at around 201, and it was laid underground.