The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court rendered a judgment dismissing public prosecution as to the assault among the facts charged in the instant case, and convicted the remainder of the facts charged.

However, since only the defendant appealed on the conviction part, the judgment dismissing public prosecution among the judgment below is excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape with Persons with Disabilities), among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant was sexual intercourse between the victim B and the date and place stated in the facts charged, but there was no assault or threat to suppress the victim B’s resistance. The Defendant was irrelevant to sexual intercourse. 2) The Defendant did not recognize the fact that he was a disabled person with a intellectual disability by the victim B.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (five years of imprisonment, 80 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment programs, and 10 years of employment restriction) is too unreasonable.

3. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관하여 1 원심은 피고인이 피해자 B를 폭행협박으로 강간하였는지에 관하여 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거를 종합하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피해자 B는 이 사건 발생 직후 수사기관에서 범행 경위도구행위태양 등에 관하여 각색이나 꾸밈이 없이 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하였고 이러한 진술내용에서 경험칙에 비추어 비합리적이거나 모순되는 부분을 찾기 어려운 점, ② L센터에서 피해자 B의 진술을 들은 K은 원심 법정에 출석하여 당시 피해자 B가 술에 취한 상태가 아니었고 피해사실을 과장하는 것으로 보이지 아니하였다고 진술하였으며, 피해자 B는 지적장애가 있는 사람으로서 개념의 활용이나 언어적 능력에 있어서...