The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds of appeal (as to the acquittal part), the victim has made a consistent statement about the main damaged part; according to the medical certificate, there is no circumstance to deem that the victim had received medical treatment at the hospital due to the defendant's act on the day of the crime in this case, and there is no other reason to deem that the victim had undergone medical treatment at the hospital; the witness F and G testimony at the court below, which seems consistent with the defendant's lawsuit, are hard to believe it as it is in light of their relationship with the defendant; although it can be recognized that the defendant has inflicted bodily injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the above facts

2. Determination

A. On April 12, 2013, the Defendant, at the D apartment management office located in Chuncheon City, around 06:15, inflicted an injury on the part of the Defendant, at the D apartment management office, on the part of the victim, in which approximately two weeks of the victim’s severe fingers are required to be treated as unauted and unauted, such as fingers’ external wounds, etc.

B. The court below held that the victim asserted that G was at the site of this case from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and that at the time of the police investigation, G was at the site at the time of this case and the victim was at the time of the police investigation, obstructed the two arms, and obstructed the entrance through which he could not re-enter into the management office, but G testified that he was at the time of his attendance at the court of the court below, and that G was at the time of attendance at the time of the court of the court below, and even if G’s call record at the time of G did not appear at the management office before the time of attendance, it did not seem that G was at the time of attendance at the time of the defendant or a third party, and that the victim did not go beyond the victim’s statement.