logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.05.01 2013구합30049
난민불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 25, 2009, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a visa (D-4, the period of stay six months) and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 23, 2010.

B. On December 28, 2012, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having “a sufficiently-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On January 18, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant disposition with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the said objection on November 1, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that he actively participated in the activities of a group of young groups in the Republic of Korea (Seoutn's Namon's Namon's hereinafter referred to as the "Esene") B, claiming the separation of English area in the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea. The plaintiff argued that he actively participated in the activities of raising the flag of the South-North Korean flag in October 2002.

However, the Ameri Government, however, set E.S. as an illegal organization and pressures E.S.'s activities.

In this situation, the plaintiff was present at the Escen City conference held in B in October 2007, but was arrested by the police of the Kameri and detained, and was released from Kasscen with the help of the counsel.

After that, on December 13, 2008, the Plaintiff opened a regular meeting at E.S. Si on December 13, 2008 and performed activities such as protruding the leaflet and promoting the E.S. conference.

During that period, the plaintiff is open at Tiko in November 2009.

arrow