The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a heavy equipment business operator in the facts charged.

At around 20:30 on May 26, 2014, the Defendant stated that “A victim C (14 years of age, South) who had a stable tool within the sports site of the “Yero Middle School” as “I am kn kn kn kn kn and kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.”

At this time, the victim tried the victim's chest once again on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim was able to take a desire to be called "spawn" to the son who was on the side of the victim, was misunderstanding that the victim was spawn, spawned twice by the spawn floor, and 21:00 on the same day, the victim abused the victim's chest once again on the part of the victim's chest because the victim did not take a desire to do

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, on December 19, 2014, after the institution of the instant indictment, the victim submitted an application for non-prosecution to punish the Defendant, which expressed the victim’s intention not to punish the Defendant. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.