The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was not accompanied to the police station in the form of legitimate voluntary movement, but illegally arrested without being informed of the Mondo principle, and thus all the evidence acquired after the arrest cannot be used as evidence of guilt. The court below convicted the defendant of the facts charged in this case on this basis. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted the same purport as the reasons for appeal of this case in the court below, and the court below rejected the above argument in detail with the defendant's and his defense counsel's arguments under the title of "decision on the defendant's and defense counsel's arguments" in the judgment of the court below. In light of the above judgment of the court below compared with records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts or in the misapprehension of legal principles.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.