1. The Defendant’s KRW 123,494,720 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from August 26, 2014 to November 15, 2017.

(c) shall be.

2) The contract under which the contract is made (hereinafter “instant contract for construction”)

(2) On June 20, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a construction contract with the following contents (hereinafter “instant modified construction contract”).

The defendant (4j) the project owner (contractor) and the plaintiff who is the contractor shall enter into a contract for the change of the contract for private construction works as follows:

Section 1. (Definitions) This Agreement is a modified contract for the instant construction project concluded on October 5, 2013.

Date scheduled for completion of a period for which a change was originally completed on June 20, 2014: The contract amount of KRW 1,732,500,000 for the last contract amount on July 15, 2014: 1,575,000 for the supply value of value of KRW 1,575,500,000 for the value-added tax: 2,062,50,500 for the supply value of KRW 2,000 for the supply value of KRW 1,875,00,000 for the value-added tax of KRW 187,50,000 for the value-added tax of KRW 187,50,000 for the following:

* The additional amount of contract for design change: 330,00,000 won - the value of supply: 300,000,000 won - Value-added tax: 30,000,000 won - The additional amount of contract for design change: each of the provisions of the original contract not modified in the modified contract, Article 3 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Contract) of Part III (Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Contract) of the Additional amount of contract,

3) On August 4, 2014, the Defendant applied for approval to use the instant building to the head of the branch office, which was approved on August 11, 2014, and obtained approval for use on August 11, 2014. [Grounds for recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, 6 through 8, and 12 (including the number of each branch office; hereinafter the same shall apply).

2) The statement Nos. 1, 3, and 4, the fact inquiry results against the head of the branch office over the e-mail of this Court, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The plaintiff's assertion as to the cause of the claim 1) The plaintiff's assertion is that the construction cost increased between the defendant and the defendant is 13,800.