logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.25 2016가합56801
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the plaintiff A and B, each of the KRW 108,00,000 and the KRW 54,000,000 and each of the said money to the plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties (1) Defendant AWn City Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant AWnD Development”) is a company engaged in real estate sales and lease business, and performed its duties as the executor of the business of constructing the Seo-gu Busan Htel (hereinafter “instant officetel”).

(2) Defendant D Limited Liability Company (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a company that engages in real estate sale and lease business, etc., and Defendant E is the representative director of Defendant D.

(3) Defendant G is a licensed real estate agent operating real estate brokerage business under the trade name of “I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office,” and Defendant F is a person registered as a broker assistant of Defendant G from July 15, 2008 to June 15, 2016.

B. (1) Defendant F, upon entering into the instant instant instant instant instant officetel sales contract with the Plaintiffs and Defendant L&D Development, was allowed to sell the instant officetel at the Internet J newspapers. Around October 27 to 28, 2015, Defendant D acquired the right to sell KRW 30 out of the instant officetel from Defendant L&D development. Defendant D’s acquisition of the right to sell the instant officetel at a discount for the purpose of securing funds due to the imminent completion of construction, and recommended Defendant D to enter into the sales contract on the instant officetel with Defendant L&D development.

(2) On October 27 to 28, 2015, the Plaintiffs concluded a sales contract with Defendant L&D Development and the instant officetels (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) as follows (hereinafter “each of the instant contracts”) and paid each of the sales prices to Defendant D, and Defendant F paid each of the KRW 300,000 per each contract under the pretext of brokerage commission.

(unit: the date of concluding the contract for the object of sale (the date of payment for the sale price) is the sales price under the contract for the object of sale, Plaintiff A, the instant officetel (hereinafter the same shall apply).

arrow