beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. The Defendant in the instant charges is C-wing and freight driver.
On May 7, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 17:13, and continued the front of the Taebong Village in the Cheongbong-gu, Cheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Taenam-do, with the view to a spoke from the spoke on the surface of the bank.
The location is a two-lane road where signal, etc. is operated, and red stop signal, etc. has been operated in the direction of the defendant at the time.
Nevertheless, the Defendant proceeded with the above road as it is on the red signal and violated the signal.
2. The Defendant consistently asserted that he/she passed a green crossing from the control point to the point of view, and that he/she did not have any violation of signal.
According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, police officers D and E entered the intersection immediately after the signal of the intersection was changed from yellow to red. At the time, the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle was transported at a certain distance to 300 to 400 meters. However, even though the signal of the intersection was seen at the control point, the first 40 meters in the direction of the control point is about the intersection. At the time, the police officer’s first 40 meters in the direction of the intersection was in the direction of the control point. At the time, the police officer’s control was not seen as the stop line of the intersection. At the time, the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s of the vehicle at the low speed f, who was the driver of the vehicle at the intersection, entered the intersection immediately after the signal of the intersection was changed from yellow to red. At that time, the fact that the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle at the time was driven in the front of the vehicle
According to the above facts, it is difficult to recognize that the defendant passed the red signal crossing to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the above police officers could have mistakenly seen, and there is no possibility that the police officers passed the intersection before red signal.
3. Thus, the facts charged in this case are not proven.