1. The sentence against the accused shall be three million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2016, the Defendant driven a B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-S

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the arrest report of the case, the notification of the results of regulating drinking driving, the inquiry into the results of regulating drinking driving, the statement of the situation of the driver under driving, and the next inquiry;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Article 148-2 subparag. 3 (Selection of Penalty) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in the workhouse is not good in light of circumstances, danger, etc., and despite the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for driving under influence of alcohol three times (3 times in 2002, a fine of 1.5 million won in 2005, a fine of 500 million won in 2005, and a fine of 2.5 million won in 2009, a fine of 2.5 million won in 2009, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

The facts that the Defendant has led to the confession of all of the crimes in this case and seriously against the Defendant, that there was no criminal history exceeding the fine, and that the Defendant was living without other criminal records for about seven years after being sentenced to a fine due to driving of drinking as above in 209 are favorable to the Defendant.

In addition, in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the arguments and records of the case, such as the age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.