logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고정1430
관세법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government "E" who sells Japanese multilateral-processed products and cosmetics through Internet site D, etc.

1. Any person who intends to import goods shall report to the head of a customs office the description, quantity, quantity, value and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, around January 27, 2012, the Defendant imported goods of Japanese Cratia containing “F” 97 pcc and Japanese Cratia 116,400 p and imported them in a way of carrying and carrying them directly without filing a declaration with the customs office, and from that time until October 30, 2013, the Defendant imported them in a total of 11 times without filing a report equivalent to KRW 2,494 pc, Japanese currency 2,963,00,00 (Goods KRW 38,581,533, market price 48,90,80,000, as indicated in the “Smuggling Import Crime List,” as indicated in the attached Table from that time until October 30, 2013.

2. No one shall use a trademark identical with another person's registered trademark on goods similar to the designated goods or use a trademark similar to the other person's registered trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods;

Nevertheless, the Defendant illegally infringed on the trademark right of KRW 32,00 by forging F 1 pc and Jin goods market price, which used the trademark “F” which used the trademark registration (registration number I) as designated goods to the Korean Intellectual Property Office of Korea at H H around August 21, 2012 through the Internet Open Market (11) for KRW 16,240,00. From that time to November 24, 2013, the Defendant sold KRW 2,293 pc, 73,376,00 on a total amount of 1,48 times, such as the list of crimes in violation of the Trademark Act, from that time until November 24, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow