logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.12.01 2017고합27
배임수재
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and three months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant C’s fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The charges were appropriately revised.

[Status of the Defendants] In around 1982, Defendant A acquired a school foundation H (hereinafter “H”) operating the “E Commercial High School” (F High School around 1984, and the name was changed to “G high school” around 1994; hereinafter “G”) and assumed office as the president.

However, around September 3, 2010, Defendant A was indicted on suspicions that he received the so-called “reward rebates” from G construction business operators, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and on suspicions of embezzlement of school funds, etc., Defendant A was not detained. On July 15, 2011, the Office of Education was revoked the approval of the president.

Defendant

A, who was dissatisfied with the cancellation of the approval of the chief executive officer, was finally dismissed, and the cancellation of the approval was registered on October 21, 2014.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, while maintaining the office of “a founder” in a G high-rise building, has been holding the reduction of “a person who is a graduate school,” and has received a report on the details of G intention from Defendant B, who is the head of G high-level administrative office, and finally approved the details of G intent, and has de facto overall control over H and G affairs even after the revocation of the approval by receiving a report on various academic schedule from Defendant B and Defendant C.

Defendant

B, as Defendant A’s early aircraft in 199, he was employed in G High Administrative Office from July 201 to work as the head of G High Administrative Office around December 31, 2016. Since Defendant C was issued as the principal of G on September 1, 2014, Defendant C performs his duties as the principal until now, and Defendant D was appointed as a director of H around October 2013 due to the relationship with Defendant B and K Co., Ltd (hereinafter “J”) while operating the principal of G and K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”).

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant D’s statement that there was a recruitment of G intention from B from around September 2014 to around October, 10, and the Defendant around that time.

arrow