1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and the defendants citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the court's reasoning concerning this case is as follows: ① it is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that there is no responsibility for the plaintiff with respect to the occupational accident occurred on December 8, 201 (hereinafter "the accident in this case") and Gap evidence Nos. 11 and 12 (including number number; hereinafter the same shall apply); ② the defendant in the first instance judgment Nos. 6 and 21 shall be deemed to be the above defendants; ② the "the date of the closing of argument in this case" in the 7th and 9th 10th 7th 19th 7th 21th 7th 21th 7th 21th 7th 201 "the date of the closing of argument in this case"; and the "the defendant in this case" in the 8th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 200 "the above defendants" shall be deemed to be the "the defendants"; and the defendants' assertion that "the defendant in this case" in this part 20th 9th 20th 3th 3th 20th ju or 9th 20th 3.".

2. Additional determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment 1) The Plaintiff did not claim medical care benefits against the Defendants, and thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion cannot deduct KRW 29,160,730 from the damages compensation against the Defendants. 2) The Plaintiff’s argument and judgment were examined.