A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. From April 2014, the Defendant had no intent and ability to pay rent on the agreed date, even if he/she purchased and used the de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto

Nevertheless, on March 2015, the Defendant was awarded a subcontract to the Defendant for construction of a pellet in the vicinity of the Pyeongtaek-si court located in Pyeongtaek-do. The lease of the pellet to the Do to the Do to the Do so that the Do can purchase the pellet. The rent would be paid without the mold at the end of each month.”

Nevertheless, on March 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay rent of KRW 20 million even after the lease of the pump from the victim, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to that amount.

B. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would pay construction cost as the completion of the construction work on the ground that he was awarded a subcontract to the said victim for the construction work for the 2 Haak-dong, which was newly constructed in the Gyeonggi-do Gwangju, to the said victim at the construction site located in Pyeongtaek-si D.”

However, the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant had a debt equivalent to KRW 400,000,000 from F operated by the Defendant from April 2016 to May 2016, and was accused of the violation of the Labor Standards Act by failing to pay the total of KRW 69,60,000 to 14 employees; and (b) even if having received construction payment from E, the Defendant was planned to use it to pay the existing debt; and (c) even if the victim requested the work of molding, the Defendant had no intent and ability to pay the construction payment

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, and let the victim do so, from December 2, 2016 to December 2017.