Defendant shall be punished by a fine for negligence in KRW 7,000,000 (locks only).

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of the 2018 Highest 1784 on March 5, 2018 is a “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in the Gu Government-Si of Gu around 22:00 on March 5, 2018 without any justifiable reason.

Since then, it obstructed the victim's restaurant business by force, such as cutting in large sounds, being frightened on the table, and booming a cafeteria and a boomed on the floor of a restaurant, unleashing customers who drink food on the cafeteria, and allowing them to hold a restaurant.

around 17:40 on April 5, 2018, the Defendant continued to take a bath at the “H restaurant” operated by the wife G of the Victim F ( South, the age of 52) in Ansan-si on April 5, 2018, and continued to have a dispute with the victim.

During that period, the defendant gets a knife knife (20cm in knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

“ and as you have threatened, as they were.”

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1784"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of C and I;

1. A report on investigation;

1. The scene of interference with the affairs and photographs thereof;

1. A receipt for loss from interference with business (a receipt for non-calculated of other customers);

1. 12 Notification to a department related to the report of the case to the 112 case, 2018 Highest 2224;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning internal investigation reports (Attachment of site photographs of the case), field photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are heavy in light of the method and form of the instant crime, risk, Defendant’s like criminal records, etc.

However, the defendant is trying to not repeat the crime, such as receiving a mental therapy, with his or her mistake divided.