logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.12.05 2013고합82
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Bas 2013 high-rise91

A. A. On August 20, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at a disabled organization office of a disabled person E (the age of 53 at that time) working for C, the Defendant called “A may allow B to find employment of KRW 30 million in Samsung Shipbuilding by inserting money to the account until August 25, 2010.” However, if the Defendant is paid KRW 30 million from the victim, the Defendant would immediately be hired. However, even if the Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim, he/she did not have an intention or ability to find employment in Samsung Shipbuilding. The Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim to the account in the name of F, which the Defendant designated on August 25, 2010, and the Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant’s post office and received KRW 40 million from the victim on September 25, 2010.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to find employment for the victim's children in Samsung Shipbuilding.

The Defendant received 4 million won in cash in front of the victim’s house located in G building 215 at the time of the death from the victim.

3 In September 2010, the Defendant called, “The Defendant sent a telephone to the victims, and changed KRW 2 million, since he/she should give tin gift to his/her male employees.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to find employment for the victim's children in Samsung Shipbuilding.

The Defendant received 200,000 won in cash from the victim's fluor C in a case where he was fluored by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and obtained a total of 36 million won through three times.

B. The Defendant is required to borrow money to the victim at a place where he was on the early December 2010, where the victim was in need of money due to his death.

4 million won.

arrow