logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.04.24 2014고단1819
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged at around 20:0 on March 20, 2014, the Defendants: (a) around 20:00, in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon; (b) the victim F (the age of 61) who used the embankment with the Defendants, as the boiler to Defendant A, went to a dispute; and (c) Defendant A was plicked by plicking the victim’s flaps from the victim’s back to the victim, and Defendant B was skeing the victim’s flab.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the part of the victim, i.e., the so-called so-called the so-called so-called the so-called so-called the so-called so-called the so-called “abs

2. Determination

A. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case is admissible, F and G statements, etc., and the credibility of the above statements is examined.

B. First of all, in this Court, F stated in this Court that “The head part of Defendant A, and H was attached to the bridge, and plucked and plucked against Defendant B. At the investigation agency, the person who plucked or plucked his hand was the Defendant B. Whether Defendant A was plicked or plucked of his hand. Whether or not the Defendant A was plucked or plucked by assault by the Defendants and H is not well memory.” The Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant was injured by the assault by the Defendants and H,” and the investigative agency made a statement to the same effect.

C. Even if the above F’s statement is assumed to be the above facts, the facts charged in this case are as follows: “Defendant A plucked up and plucked up the plucks of F, and Defendant B plicked the F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

Furthermore, according to the records of this case, the following circumstances are revealed.

1F stated to the effect that “H was involved in the assault of the Defendants” from an investigative agency to this court, and whether H was involved in the commission of the Defendants’ crime, is the whole of the F’s statement.

arrow