Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was the representative director of the company B.

1. On June 15, 2017, there was no fact that the Defendant entered the headquarters of the headquarters of the Korea Fair Trade Commission, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-do, Cheongyang-do.

Nevertheless, on June 16, 2017, the defendant prepared and submitted a registration document for the relocation of the headquarters to the staff in charge of the above registry office who is aware of the fact at the office of the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul.

The defendant had a public official in charge of the above registry office complete the registration of the relocation of the head office of B corporation, thereby making a false report to the public official, and let him enter the false facts in the commercial register, which is the original instrument of process.

2. The Defendant, as stated in the preceding paragraph, exercised the original deed of process by allowing the registration division of the Seoul Central District Court to keep the commercial registry containing false facts.

3. The Defendant: (a) submitted false data related to the relocation of the headquarters B Co., Ltd. at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1); and (b) had the Defendant enter false facts in the commercial register, which is the original copy of the deed of fairness, and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by fraudulent means by the public officials of the registry.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Investigation report (Submission of documents for an application for registration of the relocation of the head office of A) by statutes;

1. Relevant Article 228(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 228(1) of the Criminal Act (the re-issuance of the headquarters for the certificate of fairness), Articles 229 and 228(1) of the Criminal Act (the exercise of the original copy of a certificate of process entered in a false manner), Article 137 of the Criminal Act (the violation of the performance of official duties by fraudulent means), the selection of fines, respectively, for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;