Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 11,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of 4 million won at the Suwon District Court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement).

On September 23, 2019, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle at C in front of the wife population B in a drunken state on September 23, 2019, the Defendant was required to comply with the drinking test by inserting the alcohol in a total of three times around 22:38, around 22:43, around 22:48, and around 22:48, while driving a motor vehicle at C in a drinking state on the front of the wife, after receiving a report on 112 that “A person was carrying a motor vehicle for drinking,” and the D police box E, a police officer, and a reasonable ground to recognize that the Defendant driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as taking the vehicle from the Defendant’s entrance, taking the vehicle from E, and taking the vehicle from a police officer.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not put the flab "I wouldn't think that he would respond to the drinking-free flab," and failed to comply with the police officer's request for a drinking-free measurement without a justifiable reason by avoiding the flab.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. A report on investigation (report on the status of an immigration driver) and a report on internal investigation;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, reply reports (A), investigation reports (verification of the same kind of power), application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a copy of the judgment of the District Court 2007 high-level and approximately 41784;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment has been punished three times or more by the defendant's refusal to drive alcohol or to take a drinking alcohol test. Since June 25, 2019, the penal provision for drinking driving was strengthened, and the defendant also has a driving under the influence of drinking, even though he could easily come into contact with the above circumstances through the media.