All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the part which was revised and the part which added the judgment of this court under Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

【Supplementary part of the judgment of the court of first instance】 From 2 pages 11 to 17, the following shall be followed:

B. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant issued a corrective order (hereinafter referred to as “instant first corrective order”) to the Plaintiff, the landowner, and the Plaintiff on the ground that “an illegal alteration of form and quality” was “an unlawful alteration of land: a miscellaneous concrete typology (A=500 square meters), an illegal construction: a container installation (2.4m x 6m x 10m x 14m m2), and an illegal alteration of form and quality: a miscellaneous land parking lot (a notice, A =25,00m m2)” by April 18, 2016.

As the plaintiffs did not implement the remaining parts of the above corrective order as well as the remaining parts of the "specific building theory" but rather, it was investigated that the portion of illegal form and quality alteration has increased, the defendant again issued a corrective order to the land owner, on April 19, 2016, on the ground that "illegal building: 22 Dong of container installation (office, etc.), A=525 square meters, and miscellaneous parking lot (vehicle notification, A=4,053 square meters): Miscellaneous and MT to the land owner, on the ground that "a miscellaneous parking lot (land notification, A=4,053 square meters): but the plaintiffs and D did not comply with the corrective order (hereinafter "the second corrective order of this case").

Accordingly, on May 3, 2016, the Defendant issued a notice of imposition of enforcement fines to the Plaintiffs and D, and imposed KRW 25,000,000 for enforcement fines on July 5, 2016.

(2) The disposition of imposing enforcement fines against the plaintiffs (hereinafter "the disposition of this case") 2. Additional decision of this court

A. Whether there exists an illegal alteration of form and quality or illegal construction act with respect to the instant land.