The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the entire crime of this case and reflected his mistake, and that the total amount of damage of this case is not a relatively large amount, and that it led to an agreement with the victim D at the original instance stage.

However, the crime of this case committed not only several times, including punishment three times for the same crime, but also repeats the crime of this case under the same law even though the defendant was sentenced to punishment for the same crime, in light of the circumstance and method of the crime, frequency of the crime, and the risk of the crime itself that can expand or develop as a serious crime, etc. as the victim's attempted theft or theft by damaging locking the locking device at night at night during a total of 11 times during the period when the defendant was known to the victim, the crime of this case was committed through repeated crimes of this case under the same law even though he was sentenced to punishment for the same crime, it is highly probable that the defendant might repeat the crime of this case, and there is no personal relation to support for the defendant, as well as the situation that the court below's sentencing seems to be more favorable after considering the circumstances such as the circumstance of the crime of this case's criminal history and the crime of this case repeated by the same law, the defendant's age limit and the circumstances that were newly favorable after the crime of this case, the court below's sentencing of this case.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is justified.