logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.08.22 2018고단1677
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The evidence Nos. 5 and 6 of the 2018 High Court Order 2328 from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on November 5, 2017, up to 2018, up to 1677, posted a letter to sell E contact pockets by accessing D, which is a trading site at the Internet, and sent a slip to F of the victim who reported and contacted the above.

“At the end, I sent a false statement as if you were to sell the above contact diskettes.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not have the above contact pockets, so even if he received the purchase price of the above contact pockets from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the above contact pockets to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 20,000 from the victim as the purchase price for contact books on the same day from the victim; and (c) received KRW 20,000 from the G bank account under the name of the Defendant; and (d) received KRW 3,462,50 in total three times from the victims, as shown in the attached Table 1 re-off from around that time to December 30, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

The defendant of "2018 Godan 1833" on December 2, 2017, he / she held his/her annual closing events in J.

I would like to draw up in 160,000 won in fake 78,00 won, 38,000 won, 390,000 won, and 390,000 won in fake 1.60,000 won.

The phrase " shall be written on December 3, 2017, and around 16:37, 2017, the victim M who reported and asked the above writing in the L elementary school playground located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K shall be held at a discount for employees and their family members at the end of the year of the company.

purchase may be received up to 12.6.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not have the above department store, so even if he received the purchase price of merchandise coupons from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the merchandise coupons to the injured party.

arrow