The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the auditor of the South-gu branch of the D Association did not appropriately convey the details related to the audit to the auditor of the South-gu branch office of the Association; and (b) H did not have any dispute with H by itself; (c) however, during the process, the victim did not cause harm to the reputation of the victim with the content of receiving or embezzlement money as stated in the facts charged; (d) there was no reason to speak as above for the victim who did not have any awareness during the said dispute.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the statements, etc. at H and I’s investigative agencies and the lower court’s court’s court.

B. In full view of the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the court below's judgment convicting the defendant of the facts charged of this case is just and there is a violation of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant, as alleged by the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

1) In the original trial, H was located in the office of himself, I, and J, etc., but the Defendant visited the office of his employer and mixed I, and the Defendant got a serious verbal dispute with the Defendant while she told the Defendant.

However, the defendant is receiving KRW 600,000 per month using H, K, and L as a hydrogen.

Using deaf-mutes in Ulsan Metropolitan City, 80,000 won was embezzled.

“Acadly finite, she argued that she was not a party, but the Defendant said that she was a party to this.

was made.

The same shall apply to those in which the defendant sacrines and fluents were fluent.

Then from the defendant.