Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 6, 2017, Defendant A (criminal record) was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for special larceny at the Gwangju District Court on July 6, 2017, and was released on February 28, 2018 in the military prison on parole on the execution of the sentence.

3.12. The execution of the sentence was completed after the expiration of the period of parole; and

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a driver of the Cstststuna car.

On January 5, 2019, at around 05:30, the Defendant driven the said vehicle as a part of the intersection of a shooting distance intersection in front of the E Hospital located in Gwangju Mine-gu, and was straight by using one lane of the four-lanes from the direction of the Egys Zone as the gysium of the Egys Zone.

At all times, since traffic control is conducted by signal apparatus, the defendant has a duty of care to proceed in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence in violation of signal and led to the failure of the defendant to go to the right side of the victim F-si driving who was going to the right side on the left side of the bend part of the driver's seat of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim G (19 years old), who is the victim B and the passenger of the taxi, including the cat satitis that requires approximately two weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the vehicle so that the amount of KRW 2,047,898 of the taxi repair cost would be equal to the 2,047,898, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as stopping and providing relief to the

2. Defendant B is a F taxi driver.

The Defendant driven the taxi at the time and place under paragraph (1) as his/her duties, and was directly engaged on the side of the H Hospital in the valley-dong room.

At all times, since traffic control is conducted by signal apparatus, the defendant has a duty of care to proceed in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by negligence in violation of the signal, was shocked with C rocketing car driven by the victim A, such as Paragraph 1.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence with approximately two weeks of age to the victim G (the age of 19).