beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 19, 201, the Plaintiff reported the building area of 46.8 square meters on the building ledger to the area of a business place, and operated a general restaurant.
B. On January 21, 2014, the Defendant issued a corrective order (hereinafter “instant corrective order”) to voluntarily remove the said parts of the instant building on the ground that the Plaintiff, without filing a construction report, constructed the part as indicated below (hereinafter “the instant extension”) and violated Article 14 of the Building Act. On February 14, 2014, on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 75 of the Food Sanitation Act due to the Plaintiff’s failure to file a report on the change of the size of the place of business while engaging in the extended business, the Defendant issued a penalty surcharge (hereinafter “instant penalty surcharge”) in lieu of seven days of business suspension on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 75 of the same Act.
1 2.325 General restaurants (ware) of the 6.65 general restaurants (ware) of the 6.87 general restaurants (ware) of the 0.91 general restaurants (ware) of the 1.00 square meters of the main structure of each floor by building-based 31.09 【No dispute-based ground for recognition of 31.09 【A,2, 4, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 3, 4 and 4 (including a Serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), each entry in the 6.87 general restaurants (ware) of the 1.00 square meters total of 1.00 general restaurants of the iron-frame structure (general restaurants) 31.72,615, 315, 31.09
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. Each disposition of the Plaintiff’s assertion of this case is erroneous as follows.
1. After purchasing approximately 20 years ago from C, the Plaintiff again constructed the same area as the previous building, including the instant extension, on the ground that the said extension was extended on the land owned by the State, and thus, the land of the State is owned by the State.