The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each of the instant verdict of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The facts charged in this case

A. At around 14:40 on November 23, 2017, Defendants B, who jointly committed the crime, destroyed the victim’s property in order to cover KRW 8,000 of the repair cost by cutting down the equipment, such as the rasher, to enable the Defendant A to carry out a reading center of the above building entrance. Defendant A destroyed the victim’s property by cutting down the entrance reading center of each of the above buildings into the construction section.

Accordingly, the defendants jointly damaged the victim's property.

B. On November 23, 2017, at around 15:10 on the front of Pyeongtaek-si, Defendant A suffered from the victim F with regard to the damage and damage of the property as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and caused the injury to the victim, such as the need to attach a nephical disease certificate accompanied by a nephal ppuri certificate and other conical signboards that require approximately three weeks treatment to the victim by moving the Defendant’s low-priced vehicle, which is a dangerous object, behind the back of the Defendant’s low-priced vehicle.

2. Determination

A. 1) Relevant legal principles 1) The burden of proving the facts constituting an offense prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to make a judge not to have reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest as a result of the defendant's interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1151, Jul. 22, 2010) even if there is no such evidence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1151, Jul. 22, 2010).