A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and by imprisonment for not more than one year and six months for a crime of No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On January 17, 2008, the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2008, when Defendant 1 was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement and one year of suspended execution on January 25, 2008. ② On November 13, 2008, the same court was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement and 2 years of suspended execution, and the above judgment on November 21, 2008 became final and conclusive on April 23, 2009. ③ On April 23, 2009, the above judgment was sentenced to 2 years of suspended execution, 3 years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud and 3 years of suspended execution on May 1, 2009. ④ On January 6, 2010, the court was sentenced to 8 years of suspended execution and 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) and decided on January 14, 2010.

[Criminal facts of 2016 Highest 978]

1. On July 2015, the Defendant and B are entitled to remodel two units of 'D' office located in Ischeon-si, Leecheon-si, the Defendant and B, and the victim E with the right to remodel the two units of 'F and 32 units of 7 units of e.g., E, E, and if 20 million won is the down payment, the said apartment house remodeling construction will be ordered.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the above G and F land in which the above apartment house is located are owned by H and I, and the right holder of the above land should win the lawsuit against the right holder of the above apartment house in the claim suit such as removal of the above building and transfer of land. There was no consent from J, a part of the right holder of the apartment house building, and there was no limited real right such as provisional seizure on the apartment house, and it was impossible for the remodeling project to be performed until before the cancellation of the legal relationship. Thus, the remodeling project is impossible even if the right holder receives the down payment for the remodeling project of the