1. The defendant's KRW 15,429,250 for each of the plaintiffs and 5% per annum from June 25, 2014 to October 1, 2014, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 3, 1912, the Land Survey Book prepared at the Japanese occupation point point period, D on June 3, 1912, in which both countries-gun E 478 square meters, and D residing in both countries-gun F on the same day are written as each of the circumstances in which D’s response 719 square meters and H response 2,974 square meters were received.

The assessment land shall be divided into the 1st unit of the land ( December 30, 1957) and the 2nd unit of the 3th unit of the 2th unit of the 3th unit of the 1984 unit of the land ( June 22, 1984) and the 478 square meters E,580 square meters E, 513 square meters, 513 square meters, before the 1985.7.9.6 May 6, 1986, the river 1 land J 136 square meters, J 36 square meters, J 719 square meters, 2,377 square meters on May 13, 1958, the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 3th unit of the 3th unit of the land ( July 9, 1985) and the 1974 square meters of the 196th unit of the 1984 square meters of a river, the 47414547.

B. Since then, the above-mentioned land was subject to land category change, conversion by area unit, division, etc. as follows:

C. Although the time of incorporation of the instant land Nos. 1 through 4 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant land”) into the first river area is not accurately known, the time of incorporation into the river area is currently classified into the Cheongcheon-do river area which is a national river, and the instant land Nos. 1 and 2 was registered on Jun. 3, 1996; November 13, 1957 for the instant land No. 3; and April 10, 1996 for the instant land No. 4, the registration of ownership was completed in the name of each country (state).

On the other hand, D, a conciliation division of the plaintiffs, died on June 10, 1920 and succeeded to the deceased son P on the other hand, and the plaintiff's attached P died on December 8, 2005, and the property was jointly inherited by nine children, namely, the plaintiffs, Qu, R, S, T, U,V, and W. The above inheritors agreed on the division of inherited property as they inherit each of the lands of this case by one-half of co-inheritors.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 9, 11 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Each of the instant lands asserted by the Plaintiffs is the land inherited by P, which is the Plaintiff’s prior owner, and is incorporated into a river.