logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2012.07.26 2012고단483
뇌물수수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and fine of twenty thousand won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Facts of premise;

A. The Defendant, from around May 17, 199 to around December 30, 208, worked as a police officer at the C police station, and served as a head of the relevant economic1 team from January 31, 201. From around January 31, 2011 to March 1, 201, the Defendant is a person who was able to access criminal information through the criminal justice information system (KS).

B. The relationship E with the Defendant is a person who has no certain occupation with a 'bromoer' as a 'bromoer' for real estate-related activities, such as bond business and auction.

The Defendant had a special relationship with E from August 2010.

Defendant and E are not attorneys-at-law.

C. On April 29, 2011, the Defendant was under the direction of the Prosecutor General of the Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office to investigate the case in which F filed an accusation against G, etc., by committing a criminal act, such as having the acquisition of H hospital by transfer from G, etc. at the Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office (Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office, 201, No. 7835, No. 7835), and the Defendant was under the direction of the Prosecutor General of the Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office to manage the overall investigation.

On April 29, 2011, the Defendant heard from the J (the chief of the Chungcheongnam-nam Provincial Police Agency guard and transportation division at the time) that “F, as a complainant, was badly bad for his own will, d.’.” On May 8, 201, the Defendant had F undergo an investigation on Sundays.

Around May 8, 2011, the Defendant first met F, which was caused by an investigator’s investigation at the C police station, and at this time, the Defendant said that “the attorneys-at-law was appointed as a licensed Domine. Domine. Domine. . . . can be used as a good person with good experience,” and F said that “the f was introduced if he knows such part.”

The Defendant stated in mind that he was E.

On May 11, 201, the Defendant, at the Seogyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and at the J's main line, F, the J's Godong-dong.

arrow