1. The Defendant’s KRW 70,000,000 as well as 20% per annum from April 28, 2015 to September 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence 1, evidence 2-1, evidence 2-2, evidence 3-1, and evidence 3-2, witness C and D's testimony, and the whole purport of the arguments.

The Defendant, as a juristic person manufacturing and selling tin only with the trade name “E,” decided to entrust the instant stores with the operation of F stores, G stores, and H stores directly, which are the shop occupants of modern department stores, and requested the Korea Business Start-up Support Center, a business start-up consulting company, a non-party corporation, a start-up consulting company (hereinafter “non-party company”), to conduct physical color of a person operating the instant stores.

B. On March 7, 2014, the head of the sales team of the non-party company C provided entrusted operation of the sales center of this case to the Plaintiff who prepared for the start-up of a business. On March 7, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an entrusted operation contract with the Defendant for the payment of KRW 82,00,000 for the entrusted operation of the sales center of this case (hereinafter “instant entrusted operation contract”) with the Defendant, and on March 7, 2014, remitted the down payment of KRW 20,000,000 to the personal account of the Defendant’s representative I financial institution on March 7, 2014, and the remaining amount of KRW 62,00,000 to the same account on March 10, 2014, and the Defendant paid KRW 12,000,000 out of the said money to the non-party company as the consulting cost.

C. However, since the time when the Plaintiff entered into the instant consignment operation contract, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant through C to cancel the agreement under the instant consignment operation contract and refund the price for the entrusted operation, and did not participate in the process of providing technical education conducted by the Defendant.

D is the defendant's representative I's mistake.

2. Determination:

A. In full view of the judgment of the plaintiff's claim, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 6, Eul evidence 6, Eul's testimony, witness Eul's witness Eul's testimony and witness D's testimony (except for the part not trusted in the front) as a whole, the defendant's representative I's d's testimony is Seoul.