1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant Republic of Korea is dismissed.

2. To Defendant G, each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet.

1. Basic facts

A. Each land of this case was newly registered by Pyeongtaek-si on September 21, 1999, without being registered in the cadastral record, and each registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the name of Defendant Republic of Korea on December 14, 2006.

B. Around May 1995, Defendant G (the Plaintiff’s punishment) constructed a detached house, stable, or warehouse on each of the instant lands on the ground, and the Plaintiff purchased the instant house, stable, etc. from Defendant G around March 1997 and occupied and used each of the instant lands from around that time.

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on the completion of the prescriptive acquisition on March 16, 2009, by asserting that he/she had acquired each of the instant land against Defendant Republic of Korea by prescription with the Suwon District Court KRW 2008Gadan21438.

On November 6, 2009, the above court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim, and the Plaintiff’s appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2009Na34440) and the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2010Da74935) were all dismissed.

The Plaintiff and Nonparty H (the Plaintiff’s wife) filed a lawsuit seeking the implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration on each of the instant land by asserting that the Plaintiff and Nonparty H (the Plaintiff’s wife) had originally acquired each of the instant land against the Defendant Republic of Korea by the Suwon District Court KRW 2015Kadan1510.

On April 19, 2016, the above court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim. After appeal by the plaintiffs, the appellate court changed the purport of the claim in exchange for the first time on December 31, 1989, and sought implementation of each procedure for the transfer of ownership on the ground of the completion of the prescriptive prescription as of January 1, 1998. However, the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2016Na2025025) dismissed all of the claims of the plaintiffs that were changed in exchange at the appellate court on January 12, 2017, and all of the appeals by the plaintiffs (Supreme Court 2017Da209648) were dismissed.