The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was prepared by the Defendant as a broker operating the “E Authorized Broker Office” located in the 104 of the Y-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (a) on February 28, 2008, a sales contract of KRW 627 million was concluded between the seller and the purchaser H and I (joint names) with respect to the seller’s multi-family house in Ansan-si; (b) on March 21, 2008, the Defendant entered into a sales contract of KRW 20 million (the down payment at the time of the contract; (c) on March 21, 2008, the intermediate payment of KRW 10 million; and (d) on April 11, 2008, the remainder of KRW 57 million was paid to the above G on April 11, 2008; and (d) thereafter, he was present at the time of the above judgment to have the Defendant give testimony as a witness of the contract.

A. On November 16, 2012, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the Defendant’s case at the court No. 404 of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, 75 Suwon-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, 531H of the above Ansan-do, 2012 Gosan-si, 531H of the Defendant’s case. The Defendant’s defense counsel’s “the witness” is essential as to the fact that the contract was made two times on the instant building on March 21, 2008.

The question “I was not drawn up two times on that day, but first, there was an impediment to I.

21.I have not affixed a seal but affixed an obstacle.

I have the portion of the address initially drawn up with the number of houses, and there are parts written with the remaining tamper, and because there are some seals affixed with the fingerprints, I will newly prepare the balance on the date of the remainder.

One of the two must tear, but not tear.

There is no change in the content.

“Written reply”, and “(Presentation of evidence No. 1 and No. 4) witness shall give written evidence to the existence of this Agreement.”

“3.21.”.