All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence, which the court below decided against the defendant, is too unhued and unfair.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances: (a) the defendant's mistake was recognized in full and reflects the depth of the defendant; (b) the wife and two children must be supported; and (c) there was no past record of punishment either punished or imposed heavier punishment for the same kind of crime as the crime of this case; (d) the victim C's occupational embezzlement amount reaches a considerable amount of damages incurred by the defendant; (e) the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim due to the victim's compensation or agreement with the victim; (e) the defendant's forgery of the public document of this case and the uttering of the forged public document of this case were urged the victim to pay the money embezzled from the victim; and (e) the defendant had been urged the other party to pay the money so long as the defendant would have a claim for loans amounting to KRW 50,000,000 according to the monetary consumption lending contract; and (e) the notary public, who is an official document of this case, has forged the fairness certificate of monetary consumption contract in the name of law firm; and thus, the defendant's and the defendant's motive and circumstances, etc.

3. Conclusion.