logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2020.09.23 2019누11999
재해부상군경비대상결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment as stated in Paragraph 3 as to the plaintiff's assertion or investigation of evidence in the court of first instance, and the same part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in Paragraph 2.

Therefore, based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, it is quoted.

2. Parts of the judgment of the first instance; and

(a) the second letter box, the second letter box, “this Court” to the Changwon District Court, and the fourth letter “maintenance Work” to the “Mixed Person”;

B. The Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act”) of the fourth one to two acts shall be construed as “the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Presidential Decree No. 30343, Jan. 7, 2020; hereinafter “Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”)” and the second act as “the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Ordinance No. 1593, Jan. 31, 2020; hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the Act”).

C. Each “this Court” of the fifth one and two parallels (the tickets are excluded from the parallels; hereinafter the same shall apply) shall be construed as “court of the first instance”; the 10th parallels shall be construed as “appraisal of the first instance court”; and the 12th parallels shall be construed as “the appraisal of the first instance court”; when applying the labor disability loss index, the labor disability loss rate shall be 26%, 15%, and 3%, respectively. Accordingly, the Plaintiff shall be construed as “the average labor disability of the general public.”

The 6th 3th am " shall be deemed to fall under the category 3 to 5 of the disability evaluation criteria," "the plaintiff shall be deemed to fall under the category 3 to 5 of the disability evaluation criteria," the 11th am "cata" shall be deemed to be "cata", and the 14th am "appraisal" shall be deemed to be "the appraisal of the first amcata".

3. The further determination of this Court

A. The plaintiff's physical condition, even in this court, 100 won.

arrow