A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 11, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim at around 22:30 on the part of the victim C (51 years of age) and attempted to run a cryp to E, etc., which had taken the second floor of the entrance of the “D main entrance” from the corridor operated by the victim C (51 years of age), to go to the customer, and when the victim met, the victim was hyped one time to go to the victim due to a new outbreak, and assaulted the victim at two times to go to the left eye of the victim by drinking.

2. Gman, who belongs to the F police box of the F Police Station that obstructs the performance of official duties, was called out after receiving a report that there was an act of violence as referred to in the above 1. 1. 1 at the time and place of the above 1. 1.

At this time, the Defendant, such as E, etc., who had been living there, was trying to control the Defendant, and H took the Defendant into consideration the circumstances of the Defendant in the next place, and the Defendant expressed G’s desire to “Madra, Chewing ....”

On the other hand, H turned the Defendant and Sivited E into a stairs, and the Defendant intended to “h.h.”, and the Defendant was arrested as the current offender on the suspicion of interference with the execution of official duties three times in the following cases: (a) the back head of H was flapied, and he flapied, and flapied into a flab; (b) the head of H’s flab; and (c) he flapied into a flab; and (d) he fla

In addition, even after the Defendant was accompanied by the F box, the Defendant expressed H’s desire to “I h, h.h. for the same year,” and h.h. for the left side of H once, and h.h. for drinking h to 3 to 4 times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes on police statements made to H, G, E, and C;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution;