Punishment against the Defendants shall be prescribed as a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are the believers of the G church, and Defendant C works as a house manager, Defendant B, Defendant E, Defendant D, and Defendant A, respectively.

Defendants around 08:30 on January 4, 2016, on the grounds that in the building of the education center of the victim G church located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, I et al. had access to the new road by using iron materials, etc. on the entrance and the window as a matter of church dispute, Defendant C d saw each dangerous object, as both descendants, and put the glass of the above education center building, thereby cutting off four head of the above education center building. Defendant B d ring off the construction equipment , which is a dangerous object in the vicinity of the education center building. Defendant E d ring up the construction equipment , which is dangerous object around the education center building. Defendant E d d ring off with the window and walk a wooden bed with a wooden bed with a wooden bed with a wooden bed, and Defendant D d d d d e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e g.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use dangerous goods and damaged the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of I;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 369(1), 366, and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel found the reason for conviction and sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment, while recognizing the fact of damaging property as stated in the facts charged, the Defendants and the defense counsel jointly owned by the members including the Defendants, since the damaged glass and tree events are the joint ownership of the members

the property of another person.