A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was located in Silung-si C on August 27, 2017; (b) on the roads front of D convenience points, “Adoz is enjoying personnel inequality”; and (c) from G, the background F of the E Zone belonging to the Gyeonggi Silung Police Station E District, which was called out after receiving a 112 report, and “I am locked here.”

In order to hear the word “Ishman” from the place of risk, the F used the expression “F,” “F,” and assaulted F on one occasion, i.e., “F., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.,”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to listen to a statement by a sputar H telephone);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflect of the defendant, the extent of violence is minor, and the primary offender);