The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment) is too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The Supreme Court's sentencing guidelines for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc."), including the contents and circumstances of the crime in this case, and the attitude of escape, are not somewhat weak in light of the nature of the crime in this case. However, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the defendant, the degree of injury suffered by the victim, the defendant did not relatively heavy, the defendant agreed with the victim in the course of the investigation, the defendant did not have any other criminal record except criminal punishment due to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (including the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter "Aggravated Punishment, etc.") in 209, and the defendant did not have any other criminal record, and the defendant did not have any other criminal record, and the scope of recommended punishment (three months to one year) [the scope of recommended punishment] according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court's sentencing committee for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Traffic Crimes (hereinafter "Aggravated Punishment").

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.