1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. As to the case of application for the suspension of compulsory execution by this Court, this Court shall have regard to the case of application for the suspension of compulsory execution by 2016 Chicago306.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion Korea Phone Board Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Phone Board”) filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for advertising price claim against the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2002Da162827, and rendered a favorable judgment. The said judgment became final and conclusive, but the said judgment became final and conclusive, but the claim based on the above judgment has expired and expired, and thus, compulsory execution based on the above judgment should be denied

2. According to the purport of the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 1 and the entire pleadings, the judgment of the Seoul Western District Court 2002Gaso162827 against the Plaintiff was rendered on March 7, 2003 and became final and conclusive on April 4, 2003. From that time, it is apparent that ten years have passed since the date of closing the argument of this case.

However, according to the purport of the evidence Nos. 1-2 and 1-2 and the whole arguments, the defendant transferred the above claim against the plaintiff from the Korean Phone Book on June 23, 2010, with the plaintiff as the debtor and the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation as the third debtor, and applied for a seizure and collection order of the claim 2010T and 12800, Seoul Southern District Court. On June 25, 2010, upon the decision of the same court on June 25, 2010, it can be recognized that the plaintiff's account was seized around that time. Accordingly, the defendant's claim against the plaintiff against the plaintiff was suspended due

I would like to say.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.