logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.12 2016노648
변호사법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the counsel (unfair sentencing) is as follows: (a) the defendant recognized the error of the defendant; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment; (c) the defendant was employed in D while failing to seek stable workplace due to the IMF incident; (d) the representative K of the above research institute committed the instant crime with the knowledge that it was not in possession of a violation of the law of defense; (e) the amount of the litigation cost, office maintenance cost, personnel expenses, etc. out of the amount received as the fees are deducted, the actual profits gained by the defendant are not high; (c) the wife and children are supported; and (d) the disease, such as high blood pressure and urology, urology, disc, scopical disc, and scopic spons, which are not good health, is unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have dealt with the case of individual rehabilitation and bankruptcy even though the defendant, who is the head of the office office of the attorney-at-law, is not an attorney-at-law. It damages the foundation of the attorney-at-law system to prevent unauthorized persons from participating in other persons' legal cases, to protect interests of interested persons, to promote fairness in legal life and smooth operation of legal order, etc. It is highly likely to mislead the purpose of the individual rehabilitation and bankruptcy system by encouraging reckless individual rehabilitation and bankruptcy applications. The amount of 694 cases handled by the defendant over four years, and the amount paid by the defendant exceeds 724,490,000 won. Among them, even if the defendant excluded the money paid by the cost of lawsuit and the cost of office maintenance, the amount of the crime of this case acquired by the crime of this case is significant. The scope of recommending punishment for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court is two years to seven years, and the punishment of other defendants indicted by the same crime, the motive and background of the crime of this case, records and circumstances before and present circumstances.

arrow