The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (three years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's mistake, is divided, and the health and economic conditions are not good. However, although there are several criminal records of the same kind, the defendant committed the crime of this case more than 16 times even though he was committed a repeated crime due to robbery and injury by the first head of the crime in the judgment of the court below, in particular, even though he committed the crime of this case, in spite of the crime of robbery and injury by robbery at the time of the crime of this case, the crime of this case was defective by using the method of cutting property by damaging inside the structure by opening and destroying the entrance at the time of the crime of this case, the damage amount caused by the crime of this case is not small, but the damage recovery is not done at all, the court below's punishment is the lowest punishment within the statutory punishment range, and other various matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, etc. as stated in the records of this case and arguments, it cannot be deemed that

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.