1. The plaintiff (quasi-Appellant)'s quasi-Appellants are dismissed.

2. The costs of quasi-examination are assessed against the plaintiff (quasi-examination plaintiff).

1.The following facts are apparent in records, such as the confirmation of a ruling of recommending reconciliation subject to quasi-deliberation:

On November 14, 2005, pursuant to Articles 86 and 88 of the former National Land Planning and Utilization Act, the Seopo City approved the implementation plan for the urban planning facility project concerning the development project (hereinafter “instant authorization disposition”), and publicly notified as B of Seopo City.

(1) Location of the place of a project site: The type and name of the project (2) - the type and name of the project site: The name of the project implementer for the development project.

B. From March 16, 2006, Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Development Center (hereinafter “Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Development Center”) concluded a consultation with the land owners located within the project site, and some of the land owners refused the consultation, and applied for a ruling of expropriation to the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Land Expropriation Committee on August 1, 2006. Defendant Special Self-Governing Province local Land Expropriation Committee made a public announcement of the matters applied for a ruling of expropriation, and made a ruling of expropriation on December 7, 2006 on the land of some land owners located within the said land subject to a ruling of expropriation (hereinafter “each adjudication of expropriation of this case”).

C. 22 persons, including the Plaintiff, around the Jeju District Court 2007Guhap1051, were Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Regional Land Expropriation Committee for the cancellation of the above 22 persons among each of the instant rulings of expropriation, and the conjunctively against Defendant Jeju Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Development Center.